Sexual Assault Reporting in the Guard: A Broken and Inconsistent System

In one of my last acts as a non-commissioned officer before I hang up the uniform for good, I wanted to shed some light on the absolutely horrible landscape for survivors of military sexual assault or military sexual trauma that exists in the National Guard.

This is in part prompted by a soldier of similar rank to me who claims to care about SHARP (Sexual Harassment/Assault Response & Prevention), and probably has the matching default bullet points on years of ratings, yet makes statements that approve of victim blaming or asking “why did it take them so long to report?”

I’ve detailed my problems with that soldier for his chain of command.

If you are reading this, and you are a soldier in the Guard, and you are the victim of sexual assault or rape, do not waste your time with the restricted/unrestricted reporting model. Go right to state or local law enforcement.

The Guard is a black hole when it comes to law, especially when we’re on Title 32, state active duty, or drilling status. All those lovely PowerPoints that we watch once a year are splendid, but they only matter when you are on Title 10 status. Otherwise, you are reliant wholly on your state uniform code of military justice, and as uneven as those are, law enforcement.

We’re not supposed to badmouth the Guard, and I’m not really, but let’s be candid for a second. That “trained SHARP representative” is more than likely someone that went to 40 hours of training, wears the uniform one weekend a month, two weeks a year, but for the rest of the month leads a relatively mundane existence, far removed from that level of responsibility. Very little of the NCO corps in the National Guard are in civilian professional fields that hold responsibility of this nature.  You cannot foist this role off on active Guard, either, as they have enough other responsibilities throughout the month.

And subsequently, we have very little means to enforce having the right kind of people in this role.  The 120th Regional Support Group in Maine, and yes, I’m being specific, I do not feel has the right person in this role, or at least has the wrong person in one of the default reporting roles, i.e. the UMT.

By law, by capability, and by willingness, the Guard is simply not equipped to deal proactively with rape reporting.

In Maine, there are some important things to know:

  • The Guard relies on civilian law enforcement for investigation.
  • The Maine Code of Military Justice does make state sexual offense laws into military offenses, but does not have the equivalent of an Article 32 hearing.
  • There is a 2 year statute of limitations if rape is tried under MCMJ.

There is a very good chance if handled through the Guard, i.e. you avail yourself of Army reporting systems first, you may end up with a process that moves too slow to get you in contact with civilian law enforcement in a manner conducive to physical evidence collection.

There is also the reality that tongues wag in a small Guard unit.  People will know.  Wagons will be circled.

There may be people that care, but my frustration is that we are so keen in sustaining this fantasy that we’re basically a federal force, that there are very few NCOs or commissioned officers who are aware of what real rape reporting looks like in the Guard.  We talk about the Army process without fail, but do not have a single training resource that mentions how the Maine Code of Military Justice works.

A survey of 39 other states reveals similar problems.  Yet we continue to push the Title 10 story.  Why?

What I would like to see:

  • A serious state-level commitment to having the right people in SHARP representative roles, and an audit of their conduct.  Someone that routinely posts things contrary to their role on social media, for instance, should not be in that role.
  • A serious, state-level commitment to educating Guard soldiers not on Title 10 SHARP programs, but how a rape or sexual assault investigation will be handled in a Title 32/IDT status.  Save the Title 10 restricted/unrestricted crap for the mobilization platform training.
  • Stop putting it down on rating documents by default.  This accomplishes absolutely nothing.  I’ve tried to have it removed from each of my ratings in the last decade since they started doing it, in both Pennsylvania and Maine, and I’m told it’s required.  Then fucking make us live up to it, please.
  • State DMVAs must create state-level programs for Title 32/IDT level victims of sexual trauma.  So far as I know, there is no VA provision for a soldier who suffers from a rape while in an inactive duty training capacity.  Military Sexual Trauma is widely known to have specific issues that require specific treatment.  If VA outpatient mental health services are not available, state departments of Military and Veteran Affairs must cover down.

Writer, President of Bangor's Congregation Beth Israel, soldier, programmer, father, musician, Heeb, living in the woods of Maine with three ladies and a dog.

You may also like


About Brian

Brian Kresge

Brian Kresge

Writer, President of Bangor's Congregation Beth Israel, soldier, programmer, father, musician, Heeb, living in the woods of Maine with three ladies and a dog.

About Leah

Leah Kresge

Leah Kresge

Director of Education for Congregation Beth Israel in Bangor, Maine, special educator and former school board member, mother to Amelia and Nezzie.

follow me


Flickr Feed
Flickr Feed
Flickr Feed
Flickr Feed
Flickr Feed
Flickr Feed